Thomas Paine
THE AGE OF REASON
Exemplifying the deist outlook was Thomas Paine
(1737—1809), an Englishman who moved to America in 1774. Paine’s Common
Sense (1776) was an eloquent appeal for American independence. Paine is also
famous for The Rights of Man (1791—1792), in which he defended the French
Revolution. In The Age of Reason (1794—1796), he denounced Christian mysteries,
miracles, and prophecies as
superstition and called for a
natural religion that accorded with reason and
science.
I believe in one God, and
no more; and I hope for happiness
beyond this life.
I believe in the equality of man; and
I believe that religious duties consist in doing justice, loving mercy, and endeavoring to make our fellow-creatures happy.
But, lest it should be supposed that I believe many other
things in addition to these, I shall, in the progress of this work, declare the
things I do not believe, and my
reasons for not believing them.
1d.nt believe in the creed professed by the Jewish church, by
the Roman church, by the Gceek church, by the Turkish
church, by the Protestant church, nor by any church that I know of. My own mind
is my own church....
When Moses told the children of Israel that he received the
two tablets of the [Ten) commandments
from the hands of God, they were not
obliged to believe him, because they had no other authority for it than his
telling them so; and I have no other
authority for it than some historian telling me so. The commandments carry no internal evidence of divinity with
them; they contain some good moral precepts, such as any man qualified to be a
lawgiver, or a legislator, could produce himself, without having recourse to
supernatural intervention.
When also I am told that a woman called the Virgin Mary, said,
or gave out, that she was with child without any cohabitation with a man, and that her betrothed husband,
Joseph, said that an angel told him so, I have a right to believe them or not; such
a circumstance required a much stronger evidence than their bare word for it; but
we have not even this— for neither Joseph nor Mary wrote any such matter themselves;
it is only reported by others that they said so—it is hearsay upon hearsay, and I do not choose to rest my belief upon such
evidence.
It is, however, not difficult to account for the credit that
was given to the story of Jesus Christ being the son of God. He was born when
the heathen mythology had still some fashion and
repute in the world, and that
mythology had prepared the people for the belief of such a story. Almost all
the extraordinary men that lived under the heathen mythology were reputed to be
the sons of some of their gods. It was not a new thing, at that time, to
believe a man to have been celestially begotten; the intercourse of gods with
women was then a matter of familiar opinion. Their Jupiter (chief Roman god], according
to their accounts, had cohabited with hundreds: the story, therefore, had
nothing in it either new, wonderful, or obscene; it was conformable to the
opinions that then prevailed among the people called Gentiles, or Mythologists,
and it was those people only that
believed it. The Jews who had kept strictly to the belief of
one God, and no more, and who had always rejected the heathen mythology, never
credited the story.
Nothing that is here said can apply, even with the most
distant disrespect, to the real character of Jesus Christ. He was a virtuous and an amiable man. The morality that he preached and practised was of the
most benevolent kind; and though
similar systems of morality had been preached by Confucius (Chinese philosopher],
and by some of the Greek
philosophers, many years before; by the Quakers [members of the Society of
Friends] since; and by many good men
in all ages, it has not been exceeded by any. .
The resurrection and
ascension [of Jesus Christ], supposing them to have taken place, admitted of
public and ocular demonstration, like
that of the ascension of a balloon, or the sun at noon-day, to all Jerusalem at
least. A thing which everybody is required to believe, requires that the proof and evidence of it should be equal to all, and universal; and
as the public visibility of this last related act was the only evidence that could
give sanction to the former part, the whole of it falls to the ground, because
that evidence never was given. Instead of this, a small number of persons, not
more than eight or nine, are introduced as proxies for the whole world, to say
they saw it, and all the rest of the
world are called upon to believe it. But it appears that Thomas [one of Jesus’
disciples] did not believe the resurrection, and,
as they say, would not believe without having ocular and
manual demonstration himself. So neither will I, and the reason is equally as good for me, and for every other person, as for Thomas.
It is in vain to attempt to palliate or disguise this matter.
The story, so far as relates to the supernatural part, has every mark of fraud and imposition stamped upon the face of it. Who were
the authors of it is as impossible for us now to know, as it is for us to be
assured that the books in which the account is related were written by the
persons whose names they bear; the best surviving evidence we now have
respecting this affair is the Jews. They are regularly descended from the
people who lived in the times this resurrection and
ascension is said to have happened, and
they say, it is not true.